Our research began with the idea in the brief of ‘infra’ structure or the ‘below’ structure within society. We examined the ‘Health Centre’ typology more laterally as ‘health’ and wellbeing within the city. At present the ‘Health Centre’, and in general buildings of health, are a reactionary typology that one uses after an event. Be that feeling unwell, the news of a relative being sickly or a diagnosis, resulting in these building acquiring a stigmatism and singularity in use. We approached the typology with the opposite intent, and explored a programme that encourages a passive use by anyone, at any time, be they ill or not.
Early in the process, we identified mental health and wellbeing as one of the major challenges of the 21st century. Unlike sickness or disease, which can often be treated by pills or procedures; stress, anxiety, depression and other similar conditions have an opaquer course of treatment. Furthermore, the causes of which are ingrained in a person’s social and material setting, or upbringing and relationships.
We considered the proposal to be a tool for all, including the staff and family members, but in particular young adults in dealing with mental well-being issues and life debilitating circumstances. Whilst this is not something that can be achieved through a single room, diagnosis or conversation. Our research showed that architecture can have a positive effect for people dealing with mental wellbeing. A key part of our design was to find a human scale and a welcoming, calm atmosphere to help people relax and begin a conversation.
To achieve this, we are advocating the de-institutionalisation, de-categorise and re-centralisation of the health centre, and proposing it as more than just a space for treatment, or waiting room, but as a myriad of typologies: A Health Centre, A Spiritual Place, A Sanctuary, A Place of refuge, A Refectory, A Retreat, A Landscape, A Vessel, A Public room, A Running track, A Gallery, A Bath house, A Library; thus allowing the programme to be used in a more varied, relaxed and passive manner, therefore removing the stigmatism of the ‘health centre’ and its occupation.
The discourse around mental health is often one people reluctantly engage with candidly. Our response to this was to celebrate the idea of mental wellbeing with an overt, celebratory and recognisable piece of architecture that actively engages with people, the city, the street and talks openly about the subject matter.